fittan
03-16 02:55 PM
pd_recapturing...Thanks for the link. I've read it earlier and it is very useful.
ganguteli...what's up your ass? pd just inform the community over a informative link and you go berserk about "hero worship", "trash talk IV" and your $25 contribution. Dude, are you serious?
ganguteli...what's up your ass? pd just inform the community over a informative link and you go berserk about "hero worship", "trash talk IV" and your $25 contribution. Dude, are you serious?
wallpaper It#39;s a shame Taylor#39;s not
vjkypally
02-07 11:27 AM
I just called and they told that my employer should write to Vermont Service Center.Yes, this is not falling in place with their processing dates. But i think, you should be getting your approval any time. May be, have your attorney contact Vermont center for inquiry. Or you can call the customer service directly.
n.sravan
10-04 10:40 AM
Also, forgot to mention, We have both passports with us (old surname and new surname)
2011 i love taylor lautner love
GCVivek
03-29 04:52 PM
No, I did not misunderstand. That reply had no quote included and therefore was directed to the person who opened the thread (see very first post from AkhiChopra) and that has everything to do with salary. :o
I think you misunderstood. The OP is talking about his friend, his company and payment from clients. It has nothing to do with salary
I think you misunderstood. The OP is talking about his friend, his company and payment from clients. It has nothing to do with salary
more...
maverick_neo
08-14 02:31 PM
Yes
Exactly why I want to wait for AP, fear of H1B visa rejection
Exactly why I want to wait for AP, fear of H1B visa rejection
nomi
12-11 02:14 PM
SO if USCIS wants to make a new rule of filing I485 for the one whose I 140 is cleared and priority date is not current, It CAN DO That RULE Right?
We do not need any Congress approval for that Right?
If so can we explore this option??
I agree with you. Why we don`t explore this option ???? USCIS make so many rule by itself then why they don`t make this rule to file 485 while PD is not current without going in Senate. Like they start premium processing of I-140. They make this rule without any bill in US Senate. correct me if I am wrong
I think, core team should look this option or ask us to find more information about it. I think, core team can meet with high official from USCIS.
what do you guys think about it ??
thx.
We do not need any Congress approval for that Right?
If so can we explore this option??
I agree with you. Why we don`t explore this option ???? USCIS make so many rule by itself then why they don`t make this rule to file 485 while PD is not current without going in Senate. Like they start premium processing of I-140. They make this rule without any bill in US Senate. correct me if I am wrong
I think, core team should look this option or ask us to find more information about it. I think, core team can meet with high official from USCIS.
what do you guys think about it ??
thx.
more...
conundrum
05-29 08:05 PM
way to go... What optimism!!!
Guys instead of being a pessimistic, lets all be optimistic and hope for the best case scenario.
Guys instead of being a pessimistic, lets all be optimistic and hope for the best case scenario.
2010 Don#39;t ask Taylor Lautner to take his shirt off. You#39;re making him feel bad!
sbeyyala
05-24 12:30 PM
Sent
more...
gbof
10-26 01:31 PM
My case is very straight-forward but some really inefficient guy is making it complicated. I need your experience and inputs. Please do advise.
I came to US on J-1 in 2000. After 3-years on J-1 got 'waiver (i-612)" and then moved on to H1B visa and filed I-485 in july07 (with an approved I-140). I have stayed with the same university medical school (my GC sponsor) since 2000. Last month, I got a simple RFE --asking for a copy of approval notice of 'waiver' . Same was sent within a day and it followed with several LUDs and read rfe response received.....
Last week, got 'Notice of Intent to Deny (NOID)' for myself and same/ditto for my derivative-spouse. It is asking both of us to provide evidence/ IAP-66 and H1B approvals to prove our legal status from 2000 to 2006 (Please, note they asked only until 2006 and not until today). I have IAP-66 and H1B approvals ready to respond to this.
My Question is: Since my spouse/derivative was my dependant and was on J-2 visa, the IAP-66 were all in my name how should we respond to derivative's noid as-far-as IAP-66 approvals are concerned. We know IAPs and waiver are good for dependants and I want to end this back-and-forth with my response to uscis.
Please, advise and let me know of your thoughts....
^^^bump^^^
I came to US on J-1 in 2000. After 3-years on J-1 got 'waiver (i-612)" and then moved on to H1B visa and filed I-485 in july07 (with an approved I-140). I have stayed with the same university medical school (my GC sponsor) since 2000. Last month, I got a simple RFE --asking for a copy of approval notice of 'waiver' . Same was sent within a day and it followed with several LUDs and read rfe response received.....
Last week, got 'Notice of Intent to Deny (NOID)' for myself and same/ditto for my derivative-spouse. It is asking both of us to provide evidence/ IAP-66 and H1B approvals to prove our legal status from 2000 to 2006 (Please, note they asked only until 2006 and not until today). I have IAP-66 and H1B approvals ready to respond to this.
My Question is: Since my spouse/derivative was my dependant and was on J-2 visa, the IAP-66 were all in my name how should we respond to derivative's noid as-far-as IAP-66 approvals are concerned. We know IAPs and waiver are good for dependants and I want to end this back-and-forth with my response to uscis.
Please, advise and let me know of your thoughts....
^^^bump^^^
hair Taylor Lautner did a photo
chintu25
07-09 03:13 PM
:D I have printed out some Immigration Voice Fliers and will Post them in Some Temples and Indian Stores in and around Plymoth/canton/westland areas
more...
amitjoey
05-22 06:20 PM
Can some one with good english skills prepare an email with heading like
'Please approve my status from legal to ILLEGAL.' include all points from rajesh_kamisetty and any other similar questions.
And everyone in this forum can send that out to every newspaper and every senator in this country. I believe this can open their eyes little bit.
Think guys. If there is decent letter I promise that I can stay whole night to send to all these guys.
I sent this to a lot of people
Do you say that being illegal, undocumented is better rewarded than being Legal Skilled Professional in US?
Yes I am talking about C-I-R (Compromise Immigration Reform) 2007 and how all the High Skilled Professionals are affected by this. High skilled professional who helped to build the economy for years basically are not rewarded for being legal and paying taxes. The "grand compromise" plan of the US Senate inadvertently (we hope) favors the undocumented over the highly skilled legal immigrants. We are sure the intention of the senators was not to ask the highly skilled legal immigrants to throw away their documents and get in line with the undocumented.
We, all high skilled professionals and ImmigrationVoice.org (12,000+ members) are extremely disappointed by this proposed bill and we would like to oppose this entirely and would like new amendments to benefit our basic needs.
# Increase the Quota from 140,000; NOT reduce to 90,000
# Remove the country limit even for High Skilled Professionals too.
# Provide provision to apply for adjustment of status even when the visa
numbers are not available.
# New Merit based system put the Skilled professional back in the line and also increase the points earned for high
Skilled professionals at least equal to unskilled labors
# Legal status of many individuals will be in jeopardy as important provisions from AC-21 are being removed by Congress
And it would difficult for non-immigrant like h-1b to renew after 6 years.
Give high-skilled legal immigrants a fair deal! That is all we are asking for
Immigration Voice (www.immigrationvoice.org) is a non-profit national grassroots organization committed to feasible solutions to a broken employment-based immigration process. Immigration Voice is advocating for technical changes that will improve the quality of life of several individuals that are stuck in the backlogs/delays, and help the system to work as it was intended.
'Please approve my status from legal to ILLEGAL.' include all points from rajesh_kamisetty and any other similar questions.
And everyone in this forum can send that out to every newspaper and every senator in this country. I believe this can open their eyes little bit.
Think guys. If there is decent letter I promise that I can stay whole night to send to all these guys.
I sent this to a lot of people
Do you say that being illegal, undocumented is better rewarded than being Legal Skilled Professional in US?
Yes I am talking about C-I-R (Compromise Immigration Reform) 2007 and how all the High Skilled Professionals are affected by this. High skilled professional who helped to build the economy for years basically are not rewarded for being legal and paying taxes. The "grand compromise" plan of the US Senate inadvertently (we hope) favors the undocumented over the highly skilled legal immigrants. We are sure the intention of the senators was not to ask the highly skilled legal immigrants to throw away their documents and get in line with the undocumented.
We, all high skilled professionals and ImmigrationVoice.org (12,000+ members) are extremely disappointed by this proposed bill and we would like to oppose this entirely and would like new amendments to benefit our basic needs.
# Increase the Quota from 140,000; NOT reduce to 90,000
# Remove the country limit even for High Skilled Professionals too.
# Provide provision to apply for adjustment of status even when the visa
numbers are not available.
# New Merit based system put the Skilled professional back in the line and also increase the points earned for high
Skilled professionals at least equal to unskilled labors
# Legal status of many individuals will be in jeopardy as important provisions from AC-21 are being removed by Congress
And it would difficult for non-immigrant like h-1b to renew after 6 years.
Give high-skilled legal immigrants a fair deal! That is all we are asking for
Immigration Voice (www.immigrationvoice.org) is a non-profit national grassroots organization committed to feasible solutions to a broken employment-based immigration process. Immigration Voice is advocating for technical changes that will improve the quality of life of several individuals that are stuck in the backlogs/delays, and help the system to work as it was intended.
hot Taylor Lautner.
hopefullegalimmigrant
04-18 07:25 PM
Thanks for sending the email. Whats the email address that we can use to reach Obama.
Contact the White House | The White House (http://www.whitehouse.gov/contact)
Lets DO something, Please send email, regular mail or what ever method or means.
Contact the White House | The White House (http://www.whitehouse.gov/contact)
Lets DO something, Please send email, regular mail or what ever method or means.
more...
house JACOB BLACK SHIRTLESS IN
garybanz
10-04 10:11 AM
My AP and EAD both came to me directly.
I guess it depends on what we fill in our forms
I guess it depends on what we fill in our forms
tattoo Taylor Lautner Shirtless!
![taylor lautner shirtless. quot;Sorry Taylor [Lautner] but](https://lh3.googleusercontent.com/blogger_img_proxy/AEn0k_tU5AhyaLRwOSNcR7bUDiAjkj7lgdI5rNpyM4F4QQ-Gh1C3lhC2WNllCXk0EZtCJokrTAIjs9gJFUQjvUge52KJJgk6DbchbaJydQ7tcVvc11GfnJtR2p4R7SKSFAuRnQS0NXLLa08VubnW-dxRFQsqnWLYExyqsRYR0HOiZsDHWiSmpupoLepyhxhbzEcDuEsQbi8RhWK_KeNwSvObZ-ihZSilucUsgQH-tX4GRRvMVZJ1U3vtqh1Er8GbtCTZ=s0-d "quot;Sorry Taylor [Lautner] but")
anilsal
12-01 06:53 PM
Babu, thanks for confirming that this stupid rule is in fact true. I always wonder how USCIS gets crafty in making new rules.
It will be easier to just get the stamping done in INDIA. That way, will get stamp till 2010.
It will be easier to just get the stamping done in INDIA. That way, will get stamp till 2010.
more...
pictures Taylor Lautner Shirtless New
cupidking
06-10 11:42 AM
Hello ppl, :)
I'm from the western suburb of Chicago..l'm new to this forum and would like to sign-up / subscribe for the IL Immigration forum.. Please let me know the process involved..
Thank you
I'm from the western suburb of Chicago..l'm new to this forum and would like to sign-up / subscribe for the IL Immigration forum.. Please let me know the process involved..
Thank you
dresses Taylor Lautner#39;s shirtless
Dj-Studios
05-16 08:35 PM
Ok I guess I made my decision(or however you spell it). I am posting the actual image and links to the images I used. Oh and the .psd file of course.
Here is the image:
http://www.dj-studios.com/battles/first.jpg
Here are the images I used. One of them is mine but you can use it if you want. It's the cloud image. These images were sized down for file size and viewing purposes:
Photo One (http://www.dj-studios.com/stocks/arches.jpg)
Photo Two (http://www.dj-studios.com/stocks/church.jpg)
Photo Three (http://www.dj-studios.com/stocks/clouds.jpg)
And here my friends is the .psd. It's a 7.8mb file I think. I tried to keep it as small as possible:
.PSD (http://www.dj-studios.com/battles/arches.psd)
Here is the image:
http://www.dj-studios.com/battles/first.jpg
Here are the images I used. One of them is mine but you can use it if you want. It's the cloud image. These images were sized down for file size and viewing purposes:
Photo One (http://www.dj-studios.com/stocks/arches.jpg)
Photo Two (http://www.dj-studios.com/stocks/church.jpg)
Photo Three (http://www.dj-studios.com/stocks/clouds.jpg)
And here my friends is the .psd. It's a 7.8mb file I think. I tried to keep it as small as possible:
.PSD (http://www.dj-studios.com/battles/arches.psd)
more...
makeup Meanwhile, Taylor Lautner
cherryred50
04-10 11:55 AM
Hi I am really grateful to you all for responding to my problem. I have attached the agreement for your reference.
To Zcool,
I don't have a job right now with this vendor But in the future if the vendor finds me a job shall I work with him.
Thanks,
Uday
To Zcool,
I don't have a job right now with this vendor But in the future if the vendor finds me a job shall I work with him.
Thanks,
Uday
girlfriend quot;Sorry Taylor [Lautner] but
needhelp!
09-19 08:07 AM
Camera battery still charging.. will upload some pics/videos soon :)
I was very impressed by the guy who sang the national anthem...who was he?? He was too good!!
And for all of Logiclife's detractors, you should have heard him speak yesterday!:) He is simply 3 good!:) he could have energized you, motivated you and prompted you to do more for our cause, by the way he spoke and what he spoke.
We're still talking about it at home and how good both of us felt to be a part of this movement. Can't wait to see more pix and videos!:)
I was very impressed by the guy who sang the national anthem...who was he?? He was too good!!
And for all of Logiclife's detractors, you should have heard him speak yesterday!:) He is simply 3 good!:) he could have energized you, motivated you and prompted you to do more for our cause, by the way he spoke and what he spoke.
We're still talking about it at home and how good both of us felt to be a part of this movement. Can't wait to see more pix and videos!:)
hairstyles 8-pack abs of shirtless Taylor
krishnam70
10-02 03:40 PM
Hello Everybody,
Due to budget restrictions, I may be getting laid off from my company soon. I have filed for I-485 and have received EAD. I am currently on H1B. I have a citizen friend who runs his own company. He has no employees. He does pretty much all work by him self or get it done by hiring outsouced help whenever needed. He has a legitimate company - but he does not have big revenue (May be 100K/ year). Would it be okay if I join his company on EAD to get my GC going or should I look for a firm that employs lot of people and has sizable revenues. What (if any) are any risks?
Thank you.
Some scenarios to consider
1. If 140 is approved and its been 6 months since date of 485 application and your company who sponsored is not revoking 140, then ability to pay might not matter and you don't care since you can use AC21
2. If 140 is approved and it has not been 6 months since 485 application date and you are on good terms with and your employer is not going to revoke your 140 , take an unpaid vacation to fill the 6 months gap if you can, then you are still safe to use AC21.
3. If your 140 is not approved but you have passed the 180 days litmus test and you use AC21 to move to another employer then the ability to pay might come in to picture if any RFE is done by USCIS.
4. If 140 is not approved and you have not passed 180 days its a variation of the 2nd case and if you can pull it off you can use AC21 and work elsewhere later.
there might be other scenarios but consider each of them carefully before making the decision. While it might seem a simple decision having come so far in your journey you don't want to make as wrong decision only to rue it.
- good luck
Due to budget restrictions, I may be getting laid off from my company soon. I have filed for I-485 and have received EAD. I am currently on H1B. I have a citizen friend who runs his own company. He has no employees. He does pretty much all work by him self or get it done by hiring outsouced help whenever needed. He has a legitimate company - but he does not have big revenue (May be 100K/ year). Would it be okay if I join his company on EAD to get my GC going or should I look for a firm that employs lot of people and has sizable revenues. What (if any) are any risks?
Thank you.
Some scenarios to consider
1. If 140 is approved and its been 6 months since date of 485 application and your company who sponsored is not revoking 140, then ability to pay might not matter and you don't care since you can use AC21
2. If 140 is approved and it has not been 6 months since 485 application date and you are on good terms with and your employer is not going to revoke your 140 , take an unpaid vacation to fill the 6 months gap if you can, then you are still safe to use AC21.
3. If your 140 is not approved but you have passed the 180 days litmus test and you use AC21 to move to another employer then the ability to pay might come in to picture if any RFE is done by USCIS.
4. If 140 is not approved and you have not passed 180 days its a variation of the 2nd case and if you can pull it off you can use AC21 and work elsewhere later.
there might be other scenarios but consider each of them carefully before making the decision. While it might seem a simple decision having come so far in your journey you don't want to make as wrong decision only to rue it.
- good luck
rajuseattle
07-15 01:46 PM
I hope USCIS explains to us on how their work distribution process works.
Forget about that even if they publish every quarter, how many I-485 from each country of chargeability and employment categories are pending any processing, it will help analyse when one can expect their approval.
At this moment TSC is following some Pilot plus program to adjudicate the I-140 and I-485 filed concurrent, that scrwes up many standalone I-140 for whom the PD is not current. According to USCIS policy your I-140 adjudication is independent of the country of chargeability and PD. Now how in the world we explain their Pilot plus program which ignores the I-140s from the retrogressed countries is only USCIS leadership knows.
NSC at least not going into this Pilot plus program and consistent in their approval patterns for both I-140 and I-485.
USCIS is under pressure for both Naturalization cases and the VISA number utilization prior to end of FY2008, which is Sept 30th 2008. We will see some kind of RFEs for July-Aug 2007 I-485 filers during Oct-Dec 2008 timeframe when USCIS has ample time in processing the I-485 petitions.
I dont see any RFE or any other progress on our I-485s until that time...and obviously the approvals will come later when the PDs for india EB-3 and EB-2 start moving further.
Forget about that even if they publish every quarter, how many I-485 from each country of chargeability and employment categories are pending any processing, it will help analyse when one can expect their approval.
At this moment TSC is following some Pilot plus program to adjudicate the I-140 and I-485 filed concurrent, that scrwes up many standalone I-140 for whom the PD is not current. According to USCIS policy your I-140 adjudication is independent of the country of chargeability and PD. Now how in the world we explain their Pilot plus program which ignores the I-140s from the retrogressed countries is only USCIS leadership knows.
NSC at least not going into this Pilot plus program and consistent in their approval patterns for both I-140 and I-485.
USCIS is under pressure for both Naturalization cases and the VISA number utilization prior to end of FY2008, which is Sept 30th 2008. We will see some kind of RFEs for July-Aug 2007 I-485 filers during Oct-Dec 2008 timeframe when USCIS has ample time in processing the I-485 petitions.
I dont see any RFE or any other progress on our I-485s until that time...and obviously the approvals will come later when the PDs for india EB-3 and EB-2 start moving further.
aj1234567
09-21 01:22 PM
Hi Adusumilli-
do you also reviced same suspense notice,because i also recived yesterday same finger frint fee rejected,case is in suspense notice.
Thanks
Ajay
do you also reviced same suspense notice,because i also recived yesterday same finger frint fee rejected,case is in suspense notice.
Thanks
Ajay
