sid
04-02 02:34 PM
Thank you Tom and Zcool.
I did try asking my manager and the vendor if they could mention that the project could go on for another 3 years but was not successful.
The letter that I got from my manager did mention that I have been working for them (client) since jun, 2005 under a contract extendable in 6 month increments and they see a need for me for the forseeable future.
I believe my company has some direct clients... I will ask my employer to attach those contracts as well.
Again, Thank you very much for your replies.
I did try asking my manager and the vendor if they could mention that the project could go on for another 3 years but was not successful.
The letter that I got from my manager did mention that I have been working for them (client) since jun, 2005 under a contract extendable in 6 month increments and they see a need for me for the forseeable future.
I believe my company has some direct clients... I will ask my employer to attach those contracts as well.
Again, Thank you very much for your replies.
wallpaper 2010 skin rip tattoos_19.
JunRN
12-18 03:11 PM
As per AC21 rule, it is from Receipt. However, let's put some practicality into the matter. Some IO's interpret the rule wrongly and used Notice Date instead. So what will happen? Your GC denied for wrong reasons and you file for MTR because it was USCIS mistake. If you're willing to take the chance, then go. If not, better use Notice Date for practicality purposes and to avoid all the hassle of MTR, etc.
rajabeta
09-24 05:02 PM
got my receipts from CSC, filed at NSC, details in signature
checks not yet cashed, no receipt for 131.
I read in one of the posts in here that for case being sent to California, the EAD and AP are being cleared much faster than other service centers...
Does anyone has any idea about this?????
checks not yet cashed, no receipt for 131.
I read in one of the posts in here that for case being sent to California, the EAD and AP are being cleared much faster than other service centers...
Does anyone has any idea about this?????
2011 skin rip tattoos_19. skin rip
shirish
09-28 12:18 PM
ANy one sent to NSC after 23rd July got RN/EAD/AP anything , from CSC?
Basicallly trying to see if CSC moved beyond 23rd July?
Basicallly trying to see if CSC moved beyond 23rd July?
more...
sriharirag
07-19 06:26 PM
http://www.usimmlaw.com/When%20do%20I%20get%20my%20green%20card.htm
Macaca
03-03 09:10 PM
She says that only H1B expenses should be paid by employer. Period.
I have written a check to USCIS for my H1B application fees.
It may be possible that the rules changed after I wrote the check in 2002.
I have written a check to USCIS for my H1B application fees.
It may be possible that the rules changed after I wrote the check in 2002.
more...
gccovet
04-23 01:19 PM
appealing/motion to reopen doesn't allow you to stay in USA.
If employer revokes 140 then no basis for getting h-1b extensions.
Can H1 be extended on basis that I-485 filled and pending for more then 1 year?
GCCovet
If employer revokes 140 then no basis for getting h-1b extensions.
Can H1 be extended on basis that I-485 filled and pending for more then 1 year?
GCCovet
2010 Dallas Tattoo Artist Kayden
GCwaitforever
07-09 08:27 AM
Good job guys. May be it is time we invite Labor secretary Elaine Chao also to participate in these talk shows (in addition to law makers like Kennedy/Brownback/McCain). That is the only participant missing - someone from DOL/USCIS/DHS, as the Government entity responsible for immigration.
more...
Ramba
04-20 10:38 PM
what about www.hitechslaves.com
hair images skin rip tattoo by
techbuyer77
09-17 01:34 PM
That is the point. It was not of your own volition.
Also, there is no rule that says citizenship is not available to people who do not work for the sponsoring employer for a certai nperiod of time after GC approval. It is just good practice to stick around for a few months after approval, but it is not law.
You will have no trouble. Change your status from bittersweet to sweet and have fun. Also, good luck finding a new job.
Thanks! I have a job already (my bills cannot wait for USCIS) Thanks, thanks thanks thanks!!!
Also, there is no rule that says citizenship is not available to people who do not work for the sponsoring employer for a certai nperiod of time after GC approval. It is just good practice to stick around for a few months after approval, but it is not law.
You will have no trouble. Change your status from bittersweet to sweet and have fun. Also, good luck finding a new job.
Thanks! I have a job already (my bills cannot wait for USCIS) Thanks, thanks thanks thanks!!!
more...
Radharamesh
04-22 05:06 PM
I have been working for company A for last three years and they filed for H1 extension with Vermont service center under premium processing and today my company fot a fax from USCIS asking some questions regarding my managerial qualifications even though they have filed my application based on senior analyst programmer position. In my department I am the only programmer under my manager. Others are data analyst person and they directly report to my manager. Here are the following questions that has been asked by the USCIS:
************************************************** ********
Provide a short answer to the following questions:
How many subordinate supervisors were under the beneficiary's management ?
What were the job titles and job duties of the employees managed ?
What executive / managerial and technical skills were required to perform the overseas duties ?
What defree of discretionary authority in day to day operations did the beneficiary have in the overseas job.
A final decision will not be made for 33 days. During that time you may submit evidence to overcome the reasons for denial.
************************************************** ********
My visa is expiring on may 15 2008. What will happen if I do not get the approval by May 15 2008 ?
Did anyone received a letter like that before ?
Do you think the last statement of USCIS mean that I am right now rejected for extension and my approval depends on the document I am supplying ?
How we should approach the answer to the above questions ?
Any uick help will be appreciated as we have to reply to USCIS very quickly.
thanks in advance
Radharamesh
************************************************** ********
Provide a short answer to the following questions:
How many subordinate supervisors were under the beneficiary's management ?
What were the job titles and job duties of the employees managed ?
What executive / managerial and technical skills were required to perform the overseas duties ?
What defree of discretionary authority in day to day operations did the beneficiary have in the overseas job.
A final decision will not be made for 33 days. During that time you may submit evidence to overcome the reasons for denial.
************************************************** ********
My visa is expiring on may 15 2008. What will happen if I do not get the approval by May 15 2008 ?
Did anyone received a letter like that before ?
Do you think the last statement of USCIS mean that I am right now rejected for extension and my approval depends on the document I am supplying ?
How we should approach the answer to the above questions ?
Any uick help will be appreciated as we have to reply to USCIS very quickly.
thanks in advance
Radharamesh
hot wallpaper skin rip tattoos_19.
AllVNeedGcPc
04-18 06:35 PM
Thanks for sending the email. Whats the email address that we can use to reach Obama.
more...
house The sacred heart tattoo
chanduv23
02-08 02:25 PM
Isn't the UK issue different.
They are trying to change rules retroactively. There is no such thing going on here.
A similar stance would be if in midstream: lawmakers changed retroactively that only if the job makes more then $150,000 it is qualified for EB2; only companies with revenues of over $20 million can apply for greencards. If they changed the rules retroactively in USA which would preclude people who are already in line; then you would see massive amounts of protests.
However; what is happening in UK is not the same issue here. Same thing happened in Canada a few years ago when they changed the point system and wanted to do it for people retroactively.
Here, with retrogression in the background, a lot of mess is being cleaned up and a lot of enforcements are coming in place to curb visa abuse. It is quite interesting to see how enforcements are being done and how things will be handled because on one side job market is booming, on one side you find big and small consulting doing alll sorts of things and utilising visas, on one side you see locals (Especially older people who lost jobs and find it diffucult to find jobs because of their age). Overall, it wwould bee interesting to see what will the course of action be.
From what I understand, Retrogression is the only "retroactive measure using diplomacy" and I guess thats it. Stricter enforcements will be there but those who manage to get past, will always get past.
IVs strategists must look into a diplomatic angle to come up with mechanisms to fight retro which I think IV is currently doing and is on the track.
They are trying to change rules retroactively. There is no such thing going on here.
A similar stance would be if in midstream: lawmakers changed retroactively that only if the job makes more then $150,000 it is qualified for EB2; only companies with revenues of over $20 million can apply for greencards. If they changed the rules retroactively in USA which would preclude people who are already in line; then you would see massive amounts of protests.
However; what is happening in UK is not the same issue here. Same thing happened in Canada a few years ago when they changed the point system and wanted to do it for people retroactively.
Here, with retrogression in the background, a lot of mess is being cleaned up and a lot of enforcements are coming in place to curb visa abuse. It is quite interesting to see how enforcements are being done and how things will be handled because on one side job market is booming, on one side you find big and small consulting doing alll sorts of things and utilising visas, on one side you see locals (Especially older people who lost jobs and find it diffucult to find jobs because of their age). Overall, it wwould bee interesting to see what will the course of action be.
From what I understand, Retrogression is the only "retroactive measure using diplomacy" and I guess thats it. Stricter enforcements will be there but those who manage to get past, will always get past.
IVs strategists must look into a diplomatic angle to come up with mechanisms to fight retro which I think IV is currently doing and is on the track.
tattoo Torn Skin/Gears Tattoo
bskrishna
06-19 09:06 PM
no updates from MI chapter
more...
pictures tattoo across his ripped
nrk
07-12 12:56 PM
Most of the people are predicting that it will move a couple of months. If they are thinking for long time means they might have more visas ( Thinking of how to utilize the available visa numbers is good for forward movement)
dresses rip cross tattoo.
aquarianf
06-15 03:08 PM
Thats great! Congrats!! :) Are they charging $350 just for initial checkup or with shots, x-ray??
360 for initial checkup - without xray and shots
1 shot is around 60-90.00 depending on shots.
x-ray - 80.00
360 for initial checkup - without xray and shots
1 shot is around 60-90.00 depending on shots.
x-ray - 80.00
more...
makeup My take on the skin rip!
mailmy_gc
06-08 11:02 AM
GCPlease,
I too used "PARLOEE" for both of those questions.
I too used "PARLOEE" for both of those questions.
girlfriend house ody tattoo, tattoo body.
jung.lee
03-03 01:22 PM
Thanks for responding to my post.
The Forum post on the link says that its not necessary to have the same or similar job description when working on EAD. What will happen when I ask for EAD renewal?
Also, what will happen when my Priority date becomes current? Will I be able to get a GC thru this I-485 since I have left the employer who filed my GC?
I should clarify that is "better" to have same or similar job when you are on EAD so that you labor certification-based green card application has a good standing if it is challenged at any point by the USCIS - it is a safe bet if you have a similar job. When I say it is not a necessary condition - it means that you can get any job you like, since there is nothing noted on the EAD application like it is on H1-B (with specific wage and job descrition) and if there is a challenge to your application by the USCIS, your attorney might be able to find reasons to justify why you are not in a same or similar job.
Again, to reiterate, as far as I remember, EAD renewal does not ask for job description. It is a simple application to issue an new card.
Since your I-140 has been approved for more than 6 months, you are within your legal portability rights (so called AC-21 clause) to switch employers without jeopardizing your pending adjustment of status "AOS" I-485.
My understanding is that one of two things might happen- either you will get an RFE or not. RFE can be triggered by many factors including notification from your previous employer to USCIS revoking the H1-B or other issues, including simple things like address changes. You can either provide AC-21 letter from your new employer when you get the RFE or do it proactively - listen to your attorney's advice on this.
If no RFE and priority date is current, you should get your GC as if nothing else happened. If priority date is current and at the time of GC adjudication there is an RFE, your attorney should be able to help you respond.
Don't sweat things too much - a lot of people have experienced life after the protective umbrella of H1-B and it is much nicer out here in the sun :)
Just get a good attorney to represent you personally in case your new emplyer does not have an immigration attorney on retainer for other immigrant employees.
The Forum post on the link says that its not necessary to have the same or similar job description when working on EAD. What will happen when I ask for EAD renewal?
Also, what will happen when my Priority date becomes current? Will I be able to get a GC thru this I-485 since I have left the employer who filed my GC?
I should clarify that is "better" to have same or similar job when you are on EAD so that you labor certification-based green card application has a good standing if it is challenged at any point by the USCIS - it is a safe bet if you have a similar job. When I say it is not a necessary condition - it means that you can get any job you like, since there is nothing noted on the EAD application like it is on H1-B (with specific wage and job descrition) and if there is a challenge to your application by the USCIS, your attorney might be able to find reasons to justify why you are not in a same or similar job.
Again, to reiterate, as far as I remember, EAD renewal does not ask for job description. It is a simple application to issue an new card.
Since your I-140 has been approved for more than 6 months, you are within your legal portability rights (so called AC-21 clause) to switch employers without jeopardizing your pending adjustment of status "AOS" I-485.
My understanding is that one of two things might happen- either you will get an RFE or not. RFE can be triggered by many factors including notification from your previous employer to USCIS revoking the H1-B or other issues, including simple things like address changes. You can either provide AC-21 letter from your new employer when you get the RFE or do it proactively - listen to your attorney's advice on this.
If no RFE and priority date is current, you should get your GC as if nothing else happened. If priority date is current and at the time of GC adjudication there is an RFE, your attorney should be able to help you respond.
Don't sweat things too much - a lot of people have experienced life after the protective umbrella of H1-B and it is much nicer out here in the sun :)
Just get a good attorney to represent you personally in case your new emplyer does not have an immigration attorney on retainer for other immigrant employees.
hairstyles Skin Rip
lrindy
10-05 03:39 PM
One of my colleagues got audit for two consecutive years and he received his green card last month.
I can back that one up. We received audit August 13 for 2005. Had to prove we are married & kids live with us. When called and spoke to officer she said it was an "INS flag"! Honest to God that is what she said. She then asked if we had applied in the last couple of months for 485's??? She knew all about the USCIS system and said one way of telling is if you file jointly at the same address each year then why would IRS be asking for proof of marriage and kids living there etc. She was great and confirmed they had received all paperwork. Had to resend due to liquid being spilled on copies.... Even H&R Block said it was INS based.
Then we get 4 out of 5 EAD's approved, but spouse gets RFE and it is proof of name change please resubmit marriage certificate!
Cheers,
LRIndy
I can back that one up. We received audit August 13 for 2005. Had to prove we are married & kids live with us. When called and spoke to officer she said it was an "INS flag"! Honest to God that is what she said. She then asked if we had applied in the last couple of months for 485's??? She knew all about the USCIS system and said one way of telling is if you file jointly at the same address each year then why would IRS be asking for proof of marriage and kids living there etc. She was great and confirmed they had received all paperwork. Had to resend due to liquid being spilled on copies.... Even H&R Block said it was INS based.
Then we get 4 out of 5 EAD's approved, but spouse gets RFE and it is proof of name change please resubmit marriage certificate!
Cheers,
LRIndy
Dhundhun
01-24 05:57 PM
#1. Schools can have policies. For example, some schools don't allow higher education on H4 Visa.
#2. As AOS pending based on spouse, one can engage in studies (full time or part time). Also, one can do job full time or part time (if EAD is applied for). As far as immegration (USCIS) is concerned, there should not be any problem
#3. I am not sure, whether the school in question allows studies while AOS is pending. I think it does not, so they are asking to take Full Time F1.
Usually people sitting on counter may not know entire detail. You may have to ask senior staff.
I have been is situations, where INS explained me that Schools can have their own policies and that don't dictate it.
#2. As AOS pending based on spouse, one can engage in studies (full time or part time). Also, one can do job full time or part time (if EAD is applied for). As far as immegration (USCIS) is concerned, there should not be any problem
#3. I am not sure, whether the school in question allows studies while AOS is pending. I think it does not, so they are asking to take Full Time F1.
Usually people sitting on counter may not know entire detail. You may have to ask senior staff.
I have been is situations, where INS explained me that Schools can have their own policies and that don't dictate it.
Marphad
04-03 11:02 AM
http://immigrationvoice.org/forum/showthread.php?t=24795
Thanks for contacting IV with your SOS.
An IV core member is going to be helping you to fix this with USCIS. Let us know if you need help. He already tried contacting you yesterday.
As IV grows maybe this is a help IV can extend to all its donor members and help them if they get in such extreme distress situations. This is one of the ideas we are thinking for our members in the donor group.
I appreciate your response even if the guy is not a donor. Great job.
Thanks for contacting IV with your SOS.
An IV core member is going to be helping you to fix this with USCIS. Let us know if you need help. He already tried contacting you yesterday.
As IV grows maybe this is a help IV can extend to all its donor members and help them if they get in such extreme distress situations. This is one of the ideas we are thinking for our members in the donor group.
I appreciate your response even if the guy is not a donor. Great job.
