h1b_slave
02-28 06:36 PM
techy2468 same here. i had deleted part of my last post even before u replied because i felt it was going off topic.
"post office monthly income scheme" - that is good info i will definitely check on that.
In short as long as a person is on H1B he is no better than his indian counter part working in a multinational or maybe he is worse, atleast person in india is close to family ,spouse can work anywhere etc etc.
So the sooner the person gets GC the faster he has made his efforts worthwile - otherwise he will find his story similar to what sai posted in first article of this thread.
"post office monthly income scheme" - that is good info i will definitely check on that.
In short as long as a person is on H1B he is no better than his indian counter part working in a multinational or maybe he is worse, atleast person in india is close to family ,spouse can work anywhere etc etc.
So the sooner the person gets GC the faster he has made his efforts worthwile - otherwise he will find his story similar to what sai posted in first article of this thread.
wallpaper 2011 funky hairstyles for
rakesh_one
11-19 01:21 PM
I guess when it comes to GC processing, NOTHING is really "wrong" is it? If you get a chance to work around and beat the long lines, I guess "It's all good". Some people are lucky that they get a chance to get Labor Sub, some ppl marry the GC and some ppl like the rest of us wait in line like "honest citizens".
The REAL question is, just how many of us would have refused a good labour sub, given the present conditions, solely on the basis that "it is unfair to others"? I know i would have taken it. Reason? It's LEGAL (or used to be). Our "misfortune" (if i can use that word), is that we did not get a similar chance.
For those wondering, what I am babbling about: "Let's not look down on this guy who got his GC approved by Labour Sub, or even continuously point out that he did."
Positive way of looking at things..
The REAL question is, just how many of us would have refused a good labour sub, given the present conditions, solely on the basis that "it is unfair to others"? I know i would have taken it. Reason? It's LEGAL (or used to be). Our "misfortune" (if i can use that word), is that we did not get a similar chance.
For those wondering, what I am babbling about: "Let's not look down on this guy who got his GC approved by Labour Sub, or even continuously point out that he did."
Positive way of looking at things..
omved
11-12 11:23 PM
From what i know, if you have an Indian Passport and a US Green card, the only countries you can travel to without any visitor/tourist visa requirements are India, USA, Canada, Bahamas, Dominican Republic and Mexico (Thanks to Sunny1000 for confirmation of Mexico and Dominican Republic)
Are there any other countries I can go to which don't require a Visa or will grant a visa on arrival?
Thanks.
Thanks for this useful information. But does visa non requirement is valid only when departing country is USA or this would remain correct for traveling from any international destination to above countries.
Thanks again..
Om
Are there any other countries I can go to which don't require a Visa or will grant a visa on arrival?
Thanks.
Thanks for this useful information. But does visa non requirement is valid only when departing country is USA or this would remain correct for traveling from any international destination to above countries.
Thanks again..
Om
2011 funky hairstyles for short
anandrajesh
09-27 10:47 AM
The United States, previously in first place, continues to enjoy an excellent business environment, efficient markets and is a global centre for technology development. However, its overall competitiveness is threatened by large macroeconomic imbalances, particularly rising levels of public indebtedness associated with repeated fiscal deficits. Its relative ranking remains vulnerable to a possible disorderly adjustment of such imbalances, including historically high trade deficits
for full report etc --
http://www.weforum.org/en/fp/gcr_2006-07_highlights/index.htm
I Heard in NPR that restrictions in US Immigration systems is a major contributor to this slide. Can we use this point to press our case?
for full report etc --
http://www.weforum.org/en/fp/gcr_2006-07_highlights/index.htm
I Heard in NPR that restrictions in US Immigration systems is a major contributor to this slide. Can we use this point to press our case?
more...
bugsbunny
02-25 04:12 PM
Basically, there are lot of people on the other site, who don't want to join IV but participate:) They think that they might be accidentally causing a benefit to IV by joining IV:)
This seems strange...no reason you cant be a part of more than one organization
and what kind of benefit as we talking about here?
are they also EB immigrants with the same Goal....do they have other different goals?
They want to come help with advocating...but do not want to benefit us...so they want to benefit us by helping out but they don't want to officially be seen as benefiting us?? lol seems like a weird funny paradox :D
Maybe they can help with logistical support n let IV deal with the actual talking to senators part
This seems strange...no reason you cant be a part of more than one organization
and what kind of benefit as we talking about here?
are they also EB immigrants with the same Goal....do they have other different goals?
They want to come help with advocating...but do not want to benefit us...so they want to benefit us by helping out but they don't want to officially be seen as benefiting us?? lol seems like a weird funny paradox :D
Maybe they can help with logistical support n let IV deal with the actual talking to senators part
singhsa3
07-30 03:45 PM
Most likely it is an interview, I have a colleague who has similar case. But the outcome was positive. Of course, it was not immediately but they got it within three months.
Do you think he will get his case approved on the spot after interview as dates will be current at that time?
If yes, then it is worth the tension we are having.
Do you think he will get his case approved on the spot after interview as dates will be current at that time?
If yes, then it is worth the tension we are having.
more...
wellwishergc
12-11 12:46 PM
The way I see it, this is a step towards getting more revenues for USCIS. With the elimination of concurrent filing, USCIS is expecting more applications for I-140 premium processing, which will lead to additional revenues.
They are going in the opposite direction, looks like our efforts have angered them more than anything else.
They are going in the opposite direction, looks like our efforts have angered them more than anything else.
2010 funky hairstyles for girls
jonty_11
12-11 12:41 PM
They are going in the opposite direction, looks like our efforts have angered them more than anything else.
more...
pappu
09-20 10:07 AM
we have 5,857 members today.
vroapp is our newest member. Please welcome all newest members by sending them a PM and asking them to help us spread the word of IV.
Lets make it 10 thousand soon.
We will celebrate that day on the forum :)
vroapp is our newest member. Please welcome all newest members by sending them a PM and asking them to help us spread the word of IV.
Lets make it 10 thousand soon.
We will celebrate that day on the forum :)
hair Stunning Short Funky Hairstyle
IVMovies
11-21 09:55 AM
I was excited and I am really interested in this idea.
alas I am not from Bay Area ...Good Luck anyway
You can participate even you are not from bay area. Send me PM for more details.
alas I am not from Bay Area ...Good Luck anyway
You can participate even you are not from bay area. Send me PM for more details.
more...
pasupuleti
05-24 12:39 PM
sent
hot Easy Ponytail Hairstyles for
ajm
12-22 11:09 PM
I live in Chicago as well.
more...
house funky girls hairstyles.
naushit
12-18 09:37 PM
I would like to register...Just leave message here?
Is there anything I can do?
Please let me know.
-Naushit.
Is there anything I can do?
Please let me know.
-Naushit.
tattoo funky layered hairstyles.
vin13
10-07 01:32 PM
This is a very sad story..But something doesnt sound right...the son was 19 and studying UCLA and he was killed too?....
more...
pictures girls hairstyle pictures.
kufloyd
06-15 01:52 PM
Same here. I saw another soft LUD today 6/14 after a LUD yesterday 6/13. Wonder if USCIS works on Sat or it's just some regular database update.
Karanp - I'm going to try calling NSC next week to get an idea of what's happening. Do let us know if you call and get some information.
Karanp - I'm going to try calling NSC next week to get an idea of what's happening. Do let us know if you call and get some information.
dresses Funky hairstyles can be
pitha
01-26 06:18 PM
An overwhelming majority support 485 so going by your own reasoning IV might lose more members by not supporting 485. Dont try to act too smart. Lets just support whatever decision IV core takes and go with it.
I made a one time contribution myself but I have a feeling that IV is going away from the goal of increasing EB visas and just focusing on the 485 filing.Many people that have contributed earlier feel that by prioritizing the 485 filing over increase of EB visas, IV has gone away from atleast some of stakeholders .The stakeholders were promised initially that increase of EB visas would be a top priority or atleast on a even keel with any other objectives, but now we are in phased approach.I have talked to lot of people and the feeling is same.
I made a one time contribution myself but I have a feeling that IV is going away from the goal of increasing EB visas and just focusing on the 485 filing.Many people that have contributed earlier feel that by prioritizing the 485 filing over increase of EB visas, IV has gone away from atleast some of stakeholders .The stakeholders were promised initially that increase of EB visas would be a top priority or atleast on a even keel with any other objectives, but now we are in phased approach.I have talked to lot of people and the feeling is same.
more...
makeup funky hairstyles for short
sbabunle
10-07 03:59 PM
Basically to retain the PD you should have the copy of the I-140 approved and you could retain the PD. Having said that, different lawyers have different interpretations when you switch jobs and retain the PD. Basicallly some lawyers say you could retain the PD even if your old employer uses it for another person after revoking yours, while others say you can't retain PD if your old employer revokes your I-140. However if your old employer willn't revoke your I-140 then you could definetely port your PD with your new employer. If you employer is hesitant to give, you could try asking him other ways if possible for H1B stamping etc.
If a person has a copy of 140 approval, can he/she port the PD even
if the employer revoke it?
thanks
babu
If a person has a copy of 140 approval, can he/she port the PD even
if the employer revoke it?
thanks
babu
girlfriend short hairstyles for brown
svr_76
02-19 01:34 PM
Submit RTI request to Shailesh Gandhi - Chief Information Commissioner, Right To Information India.
hairstyles tattoo funky short hair styles
stucklabor
06-20 09:54 AM
stucklabor,
Thanks for your post. It's good to hear the perspective of a core member of IV like yourself. I understand your point of view but respectfully disagree with your definition of the greatest good. The greatest good will not be achieved by just passing the labor cert. stage. The greatest good is achieved once we have the GC card. Your effort on retrogression to benefit 250k & 200k is plausible. But you help them to pass one bridge, to just get stuck on the next. If there are 25k people stuck in name check at this time, imagine what will happen when the estimated 200k-250k reach that stage.
If the 25k spent in average 3 years in the name check, what will be the wait time for that massive population that are headed that way after retrog & labor cert? The EB process is a big picture and the greatest number will not get the greatest good until all these obstacle are resolved all the way to the end.
Sroym, you are missing the point. If it is only about 20% of the people who are stuck in name check - for whatever reason - the proportion is going to remain the same once the 250K+200K that we are talking about get to that stage. 80% of the people are NOT going to be stuck. IV has limited resources. We can't focus on all the issues all the time. It is the greatest good for the greatest number. You are focusing on greatest good. We are focusing on the whole.
Thanks for your post. It's good to hear the perspective of a core member of IV like yourself. I understand your point of view but respectfully disagree with your definition of the greatest good. The greatest good will not be achieved by just passing the labor cert. stage. The greatest good is achieved once we have the GC card. Your effort on retrogression to benefit 250k & 200k is plausible. But you help them to pass one bridge, to just get stuck on the next. If there are 25k people stuck in name check at this time, imagine what will happen when the estimated 200k-250k reach that stage.
If the 25k spent in average 3 years in the name check, what will be the wait time for that massive population that are headed that way after retrog & labor cert? The EB process is a big picture and the greatest number will not get the greatest good until all these obstacle are resolved all the way to the end.
Sroym, you are missing the point. If it is only about 20% of the people who are stuck in name check - for whatever reason - the proportion is going to remain the same once the 250K+200K that we are talking about get to that stage. 80% of the people are NOT going to be stuck. IV has limited resources. We can't focus on all the issues all the time. It is the greatest good for the greatest number. You are focusing on greatest good. We are focusing on the whole.
WeShallOvercome
07-12 04:59 PM
Dude, did you just compare that guy to USCIS? thats a derogatory remark and I urge the SysAdmin to take notice of such foul language... :)
That's right! No one can beat USCIS..
I've just revised my initial post.
"The original post should be read in conjunction with this one " :D
That's right! No one can beat USCIS..
I've just revised my initial post.
"The original post should be read in conjunction with this one " :D
kumar1
11-10 04:19 PM
I am in the same situation. They say once you start using AP, H4 becomes invalid....my wife IS working on EAD, she was in India for a while and came back on H4, again resumed job on EAD...then we renewed her EAD and put her current status as H4.........no issues whatsoever.
Use EAD, travel on H4......live life. I do not see any issue.
LostInGCProcess,
The only reason I want to still enter on H4 is that my H4 is stamped until 2010, hence why not use it and save money and hassle on AP entry. As you have said that working on EAD immediately invalidates the H4 status. This is OK for me, but at least I have avoided the AP procedure stuff. Plus the primary applicant is on H1 and hence we both can enter on H1 and H4 respectively rather than one entering on H1 and the other on AP. Let me know if this clears your doubt and if so, can you think this would work out. Also, if you can, please respond to my other questions
Thanks,
Use EAD, travel on H4......live life. I do not see any issue.
LostInGCProcess,
The only reason I want to still enter on H4 is that my H4 is stamped until 2010, hence why not use it and save money and hassle on AP entry. As you have said that working on EAD immediately invalidates the H4 status. This is OK for me, but at least I have avoided the AP procedure stuff. Plus the primary applicant is on H1 and hence we both can enter on H1 and H4 respectively rather than one entering on H1 and the other on AP. Let me know if this clears your doubt and if so, can you think this would work out. Also, if you can, please respond to my other questions
Thanks,
