number30
04-09 05:54 PM
You are right axp817, but small correction.
Company A (old company) attorney filed I 485 based on the I-140 approval from
company A.
If there was offer letter from company A you can safely say that job was for future. If you did not include a letter from company A then all goes by the argument of future employment. But Finally it should be OK.
Company A (old company) attorney filed I 485 based on the I-140 approval from
company A.
If there was offer letter from company A you can safely say that job was for future. If you did not include a letter from company A then all goes by the argument of future employment. But Finally it should be OK.
wallpaper cute and funny cats and
desi3933
07-31 04:20 PM
some one help please
Is your current job part time and GC is for future full-time job?
What about your fellows?
Is your current job part time and GC is for future full-time job?
What about your fellows?
anilsal
08-30 08:56 PM
need to send an email with name, email address, phone number and GC PD to:
IL at immigrationvoice DOT org
Only then you will have faster registration. :)
IL at immigrationvoice DOT org
Only then you will have faster registration. :)
2011 Very cute kitten standing up
optimystic
03-28 08:08 PM
Right but if my doubts are valid and USCIS may be planning to act in the said way then we can proudly say that " we have been legally fooled" by USCIS.
May be one of the items in Admin fixes campaign should be to request for better transparency from USCIS.
If you have transparency, a lot of issues will automatically see light and be raised in senate sessions, in media, etc.
Stupid info like Processing Dates, which retrogress for stupid unknown reasons and are utterly useless information help no one.
Some of the things that should be transparent and should be reported every month are
1) Range of Recpt dates (earliest date and latest date) processed/opened by a service center in a month. This will help us understand if they are following FIFO or not
2) Range of PDs approved/adjudicated/visa number assigned in a given month at a given service center
earliest PD(date, EB category) &
latest PD (date, EB category) &
This will tell us whether they are adhering to their own rule of adjudicate cases and assign visa #s only when PD is current
3) How many Visa numbers have been used up in each category so far. (They definitely have this information, otherwise what is the basis for them to suddenly move PDs ahead so as to use more visa numbers ! )
This will expose the speed (or the lack of it! ) at which they are using visa numbers and potential for wastage
The Gurus can probably come up with other metrics.
Most of these should be easily generated by USCIS...and this transparency will force them to work efficiently/correctly.
And since such data would also help Administration, they might like the proposal, and willing to force USCIS to start publishing such data.
Then we wont have a use for sites like :) (sorry Mr. Goel ! )
May be one of the items in Admin fixes campaign should be to request for better transparency from USCIS.
If you have transparency, a lot of issues will automatically see light and be raised in senate sessions, in media, etc.
Stupid info like Processing Dates, which retrogress for stupid unknown reasons and are utterly useless information help no one.
Some of the things that should be transparent and should be reported every month are
1) Range of Recpt dates (earliest date and latest date) processed/opened by a service center in a month. This will help us understand if they are following FIFO or not
2) Range of PDs approved/adjudicated/visa number assigned in a given month at a given service center
earliest PD(date, EB category) &
latest PD (date, EB category) &
This will tell us whether they are adhering to their own rule of adjudicate cases and assign visa #s only when PD is current
3) How many Visa numbers have been used up in each category so far. (They definitely have this information, otherwise what is the basis for them to suddenly move PDs ahead so as to use more visa numbers ! )
This will expose the speed (or the lack of it! ) at which they are using visa numbers and potential for wastage
The Gurus can probably come up with other metrics.
Most of these should be easily generated by USCIS...and this transparency will force them to work efficiently/correctly.
And since such data would also help Administration, they might like the proposal, and willing to force USCIS to start publishing such data.
Then we wont have a use for sites like :) (sorry Mr. Goel ! )
more...
chanduv23
11-19 11:36 AM
I must say Ron Rocks! See his post on his forums thread....
http://immigration-information.com/forums/showpost.php?p=24864&postcount=8
Hope this will help you to understand this issue further.
Hmmm - unless the IO has details about the new employer - how can the IO judge if the new employer is a profit or no profit or big or small.
AC21 means - only same or similar job, I don't think employer will make a difference, though wage maybe a big factor
http://immigration-information.com/forums/showpost.php?p=24864&postcount=8
Hope this will help you to understand this issue further.
Hmmm - unless the IO has details about the new employer - how can the IO judge if the new employer is a profit or no profit or big or small.
AC21 means - only same or similar job, I don't think employer will make a difference, though wage maybe a big factor
InTheMoment
05-25 07:15 PM
Good for you!
Well Aug 2008 is way different than May 2009. Dates for EB2 were current for 28 days then (for 2005 and part of 2006) ! They are not now for your PD.
enjoy :)
Well Aug 2008 is way different than May 2009. Dates for EB2 were current for 28 days then (for 2005 and part of 2006) ! They are not now for your PD.
enjoy :)
more...
a_to_z_gc
04-04 07:16 PM
Keep up the good work but be cautious- Not everyone will appreciate your efforts and be aware that I do appreciate your efforts!
I have myself talked to Congressman and the Senator in my community and know what it takes to drag yourself to take such initiatives....
Cheers!!!
I have myself talked to Congressman and the Senator in my community and know what it takes to drag yourself to take such initiatives....
Cheers!!!
2010 Tags: baby kittens cat cat
jvordar
04-22 11:45 PM
Yeah scared the hell out of me too.
yea dude u scared the shit out of me.. i'm using AC21 and will be joining new employer in 2 weeks... dude change your title..
yea dude u scared the shit out of me.. i'm using AC21 and will be joining new employer in 2 weeks... dude change your title..
more...
chanduv23
09-19 02:58 PM
He is a physician and flew all the way from WA state
Actually he works for ???? and not a physician - and flew all the way from Seattle - His name is Pankaj kakkar - correct me if I am wrong
Actually he works for ???? and not a physician - and flew all the way from Seattle - His name is Pankaj kakkar - correct me if I am wrong
hair cute and funny cats and
ras
05-22 06:09 PM
I just talked to an attorney. He said that if there is a long gap, your H1 may be approved but with out extension of stay (no I-94) and that I may have to go for visa stampling in the consulate in India. As I already have 1.5 years on h1, I was told that it doesn't go thru the cap. some one mentioned in the thread, that once you use EAD, and if u were to get H1 it would be under cap. I am not sure which one is correct.
more...
poorslumdog
03-18 11:59 AM
here is the link he is talking about
http://www..com/discussion-forums/i485-1/237011787/
Thanks for the link...Before this post i was with one green dot now with 8 red dots....thanks all those ass holes.
:cool:
http://www..com/discussion-forums/i485-1/237011787/
Thanks for the link...Before this post i was with one green dot now with 8 red dots....thanks all those ass holes.
:cool:
hot funny pictures
pitha
02-14 06:58 PM
Last time around exactly the same time in 2006 CIR took off like crazy because of the tremendous backing of Senate Judiciary committee chairman Arlen Specter and Senate majority Leader Bill Frist (who actually gave a deadline for a the bill to be introduced to the senate floor, to speed it up) and president bush supporting it as well. In spite of all these it took the senate from Feb-march 2006 to around September 2006 to get it passed.
Now to the present situation, Harry Reid, the current majority leader never ever publicly spoke one good word about CIR, the present senate judiciary committee chairman, Patrick J. Leahy has not displayed even 1/100 the urgency nor the interest in CIR that Arlon Specter displayed, president Bush though still supporting CIR is a wounded president licking his wounds and has truly become a lame duck president (most unfortunately for us).
Having considered the above facts what are the chances of CIR happening? Its very painful to say that but I think very low. Even by a miracle (a very big miracle at that) if something happens it will be November or December 2007 before it passes.
As if this not painful enough there is a 60 day waiting period from the day the president signs it before it becomes a law. I think there is some confusion on this 60 day period (I am not 100% sure on this). In addition to it if I remember correctly there was a strange condition which was something like there would be a 6 month investigation period to determine the effects of CIR before becoming a law. If you add all this nonsense up I think in the best case scenario January or February 2008 before CIR becomes law and worst case scenario July or August 2008 to become a law. just my 2 cents. I can only pray and hope I am wrong.
Bills almost never go to the floor directly. Especially something as huge as CIR. It will go thru committee again and it will go thru normal rounds of debate and amendments between the 18 people in Judiciary committee.
Its very unusual for a bill to hit the floor directly without going thru the committee that has jurisdiction over it. If it happens all the time, then the committees would be meaningless. The whole point of having a committee is to be able to either kill the entire bill, or a congressional appointment before such a bill / confirmation is debated by all 100 senators. Same thing in the House.
If it was possible to bypass committees, then people would have floored the SKIL or other bills directly on the floor of the house, therby bypassing Jim Sensenbrenner and his Judiciary committee last year.
Now to the present situation, Harry Reid, the current majority leader never ever publicly spoke one good word about CIR, the present senate judiciary committee chairman, Patrick J. Leahy has not displayed even 1/100 the urgency nor the interest in CIR that Arlon Specter displayed, president Bush though still supporting CIR is a wounded president licking his wounds and has truly become a lame duck president (most unfortunately for us).
Having considered the above facts what are the chances of CIR happening? Its very painful to say that but I think very low. Even by a miracle (a very big miracle at that) if something happens it will be November or December 2007 before it passes.
As if this not painful enough there is a 60 day waiting period from the day the president signs it before it becomes a law. I think there is some confusion on this 60 day period (I am not 100% sure on this). In addition to it if I remember correctly there was a strange condition which was something like there would be a 6 month investigation period to determine the effects of CIR before becoming a law. If you add all this nonsense up I think in the best case scenario January or February 2008 before CIR becomes law and worst case scenario July or August 2008 to become a law. just my 2 cents. I can only pray and hope I am wrong.
Bills almost never go to the floor directly. Especially something as huge as CIR. It will go thru committee again and it will go thru normal rounds of debate and amendments between the 18 people in Judiciary committee.
Its very unusual for a bill to hit the floor directly without going thru the committee that has jurisdiction over it. If it happens all the time, then the committees would be meaningless. The whole point of having a committee is to be able to either kill the entire bill, or a congressional appointment before such a bill / confirmation is debated by all 100 senators. Same thing in the House.
If it was possible to bypass committees, then people would have floored the SKIL or other bills directly on the floor of the house, therby bypassing Jim Sensenbrenner and his Judiciary committee last year.
more...
house Cute kittens, funny cats
dvb123
09-19 08:02 AM
Bump
tattoo cute cats | Funny Cats
voldemar
03-07 01:30 PM
What a rationale you are using. So then "kids should not suffer" and then the answer is yes, go ahead and reward those who broke laws with an amnesty.Hey, I don't know if you have kids, just imagine you have 16 old kid, you are on H1 waiting for labor certification and visa number to be available. While waiting continues your kid turns 21. Are you ready to send him home?
more...
pictures Cute Kitten Picture!
n.sravan
10-04 10:39 AM
Hello gg_ny,
It is too scary.. Plz note that the surname change is after mariz.. As per our convention, after mariz, wife's surname changes to that of husbands.. We have the mariz certificate with us.
Is this still that major problem, as earlier explained by you?
It is too scary.. Plz note that the surname change is after mariz.. As per our convention, after mariz, wife's surname changes to that of husbands.. We have the mariz certificate with us.
Is this still that major problem, as earlier explained by you?
dresses A few cute and funny
glub
04-03 01:17 PM
This is also key for people having questions about travel on AP:
AILA requests that USCIS confirm in a policy memorandum that an individual whose application for adjustment of status remains pending is lawfully present in the United States regardless of the fact that the individuals advance parole related Form I-94 may have expired.
Response: No unlawful presence begins to accrue upon the expiration of an I-94 where the subject of the I-94 has an I-485 properly pending before USCIS.
We will review whether your concerns warrant clarification in the form of a policy memorandum.
AILA requests that USCIS confirm in a policy memorandum that an individual whose application for adjustment of status remains pending is lawfully present in the United States regardless of the fact that the individuals advance parole related Form I-94 may have expired.
Response: No unlawful presence begins to accrue upon the expiration of an I-94 where the subject of the I-94 has an I-485 properly pending before USCIS.
We will review whether your concerns warrant clarification in the form of a policy memorandum.
more...
makeup Cute Cats, kitzen, Chats,
jonty_11
05-22 03:12 PM
Just thinkin g abt it....what is AILA's position...they will get a lot of business with this BILL..all illegals will flock to them.....including us all when we become illegals ( man that going to be fun...) i just luv the idea
girlfriend Cute Funny Cats And Kittens.
sixburgh
08-05 02:40 PM
I spoke to our immigration lawyer today.
He said that entering on h1 while I have a pending 485 does not affect the 485 in anyway.
He advised that I enter on h1 even if I have the AP.
He said that entering on h1 while I have a pending 485 does not affect the 485 in anyway.
He advised that I enter on h1 even if I have the AP.
hairstyles Kittens too Cute Graphic
ras
05-22 02:35 PM
my employment is terminated a month ago. I still need to file h1 transfer to the GC sponser. I am single
I am told that H1 can be transferred only with in 10 days-20 days or so. which means that it is already a month. so in case if I dont get the h1 or if I have an issue in the H1 transfer, is that the end of my being H1.
If I were to be on H1 again is it going to come under the cap along with those new H1 filers? I still have one and half years to complete 6 years.
I have a fall back to EAD though based an approved 140 and 180 days past 485.
But how do I get the spouse then???
I am told that H1 can be transferred only with in 10 days-20 days or so. which means that it is already a month. so in case if I dont get the h1 or if I have an issue in the H1 transfer, is that the end of my being H1.
If I were to be on H1 again is it going to come under the cap along with those new H1 filers? I still have one and half years to complete 6 years.
I have a fall back to EAD though based an approved 140 and 180 days past 485.
But how do I get the spouse then???
pappu
02-11 03:10 PM
EAD bole too....Daily Ticket
GC bole too....Quaterly Pass
Illegal Immigrant....without ticket...:).....freeloader
And what is ctizenship?
Lifetime pass :)
GC bole too....Quaterly Pass
Illegal Immigrant....without ticket...:).....freeloader
And what is ctizenship?
Lifetime pass :)
orangutan
05-26 09:32 PM
Dude, what are you talking about :confused::confused::confused: Am I missing any comedy here?
<ul>
<li>You could buy a TV but you will not know when you will get it. It could be shipped the next week, the next month, next year or never.
<li>The credit card may not be charged, may be charged twice or a valid CC may get rejected.
<li>Somebody who buys a TV from USCSIS a 2 years after you do, he may get it sooner than you do.
<li>USCIS has no way of knowing how many TVs have been ordered and how many of them are in stock.
<li>In case you do not receive your TV in two years, USCIS acknowledges that there is a long wait time for some and does not do anything about it.
<li>There would be an online survey after you buy it which would never get submitted 99% of the times.
<li>In case it did get submitted, somebody will read one out of 10,000.
<li>After reading it he will throw it in the trash can.
<li>If you get a defective TV (which is quite likely), you have a chance to file appeal by paying the same amount of money for the TV again so that your case can be re-opened.
I wonder how many customers would USCIS have eventually ??? Any guesses ???
</ul>
<ul>
<li>You could buy a TV but you will not know when you will get it. It could be shipped the next week, the next month, next year or never.
<li>The credit card may not be charged, may be charged twice or a valid CC may get rejected.
<li>Somebody who buys a TV from USCSIS a 2 years after you do, he may get it sooner than you do.
<li>USCIS has no way of knowing how many TVs have been ordered and how many of them are in stock.
<li>In case you do not receive your TV in two years, USCIS acknowledges that there is a long wait time for some and does not do anything about it.
<li>There would be an online survey after you buy it which would never get submitted 99% of the times.
<li>In case it did get submitted, somebody will read one out of 10,000.
<li>After reading it he will throw it in the trash can.
<li>If you get a defective TV (which is quite likely), you have a chance to file appeal by paying the same amount of money for the TV again so that your case can be re-opened.
I wonder how many customers would USCIS have eventually ??? Any guesses ???
</ul>
