Dhundhun
09-19 02:54 PM
We would like to know the count of GC waiting applicants with US citizen children.
Is there any plan to propose another class to USCIS in addition to EB1, EB2, EB3, ...?
I may have to wait for 25-30 years for my grand-childrens to sponsor me.
Is there any plan to propose another class to USCIS in addition to EB1, EB2, EB3, ...?
I may have to wait for 25-30 years for my grand-childrens to sponsor me.
wallpaper jeep bikini tops 93615
TheOmbudsman
08-30 05:15 PM
Since you asked what I am exactly doing here:
I am not here to discuss illegal immigration. I am here to discuss how we can put acceptable proposals out there so we can all get out of this mess, or at least get out of here a little faster !
Folks, allow me to tell you that we cannot succeed in this fight if our strategy remains wrong. By no means we shall find ourselves supporting what is against public opinion in our host country, which is now America. You guys from time to time, now what is called senior members from IV, pst phrases which may be PERCEIVED as an attempt to disguise the status of illegal aliens movement. Undocumented immigration simply doesn't exist. There are numerous ways one can find oneself without documents. I outlined an example before. "Immigrant" is not the correct designation if you never immigrated here. Start by showing our alignment with this country by using the correct term. We may be better accepted that way. By the way, wake up, is in major part thanks to the illegal aliens that many of us are stuck.
Tomorrow you can go to India as an immigrant. The day that you find yourself pushing for more immigration than Indians want, it is the day you will not be welcome in that lovely country anymore. Italy is a sweet country, but people are fed up with immigration there. How about France ? America is next. The lack of sympathy for immigration is in the air. Which are our chances to fight against it just because we conceal our proposals ? Minimal.
Sure. Do you want another one ?
immigrant
Main Entry: im�mi�grant
Pronunciation: 'i-m&-gr&nt
Function: noun
: one that immigrates : as a : a person who comes to a country to take up permanent residence b : a plant or animal that becomes established in an area where it was previously unknown
I was amused by..."Undocumented is someone who had documents, but lost them"...Bravo...!!
I am not here to discuss illegal immigration. I am here to discuss how we can put acceptable proposals out there so we can all get out of this mess, or at least get out of here a little faster !
Folks, allow me to tell you that we cannot succeed in this fight if our strategy remains wrong. By no means we shall find ourselves supporting what is against public opinion in our host country, which is now America. You guys from time to time, now what is called senior members from IV, pst phrases which may be PERCEIVED as an attempt to disguise the status of illegal aliens movement. Undocumented immigration simply doesn't exist. There are numerous ways one can find oneself without documents. I outlined an example before. "Immigrant" is not the correct designation if you never immigrated here. Start by showing our alignment with this country by using the correct term. We may be better accepted that way. By the way, wake up, is in major part thanks to the illegal aliens that many of us are stuck.
Tomorrow you can go to India as an immigrant. The day that you find yourself pushing for more immigration than Indians want, it is the day you will not be welcome in that lovely country anymore. Italy is a sweet country, but people are fed up with immigration there. How about France ? America is next. The lack of sympathy for immigration is in the air. Which are our chances to fight against it just because we conceal our proposals ? Minimal.
Sure. Do you want another one ?
immigrant
Main Entry: im�mi�grant
Pronunciation: 'i-m&-gr&nt
Function: noun
: one that immigrates : as a : a person who comes to a country to take up permanent residence b : a plant or animal that becomes established in an area where it was previously unknown
I was amused by..."Undocumented is someone who had documents, but lost them"...Bravo...!!
indianindian2006
07-12 01:16 PM
http://boards.immigrationportal.com/showthread.php?t=257057&page=2
I have pasted this from the above site.
12th July 2007, 02:00 PM
sachatur
Registered User Join Date: Jun 2007
Posts: 14
Quote:
Originally Posted by paradkaram
I am just wondering any idea if how EB2 India PD 8/2005 got approved?
I was under the impression that the USCIS will only approve your GC if you PD was current? Am i missing anything here guys?
any comments by anybody..
sachatur nothing against you. dont misunderstand me.
No offense taken. I would be bemused too, if I didn't understand the process.
I don't think many people understand that visa allocations for documentarily-qualified applications are actually made at the time a bulletin is released.
And even otherwise, if they worked on July 1st, my PD WAS CURRENT on July 1st, and a visa may have been allotted on July 1st.
Again, I have interpreted a congressional briefing by Charles Oppenheim, Chief, Immigrant Control and Reporting Division, Visa services office of the DOS here:
http://www.immigrationportal.com/sho...72&postcount=3
__________________
EB2 India PERM PD 08/25/2005
I140/I485 TSC RD 09/29/2005
I140 AD 11/09/2005
FP1: 01/04/2006
FP2: 05/04/2007 (No update)
Update message received for address change on 10/04/2006
I485 AD 07/10/2007 (Only other update on 07/10/2007 19:26: Card Production Ordered)
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
I have pasted this from the above site.
12th July 2007, 02:00 PM
sachatur
Registered User Join Date: Jun 2007
Posts: 14
Quote:
Originally Posted by paradkaram
I am just wondering any idea if how EB2 India PD 8/2005 got approved?
I was under the impression that the USCIS will only approve your GC if you PD was current? Am i missing anything here guys?
any comments by anybody..
sachatur nothing against you. dont misunderstand me.
No offense taken. I would be bemused too, if I didn't understand the process.
I don't think many people understand that visa allocations for documentarily-qualified applications are actually made at the time a bulletin is released.
And even otherwise, if they worked on July 1st, my PD WAS CURRENT on July 1st, and a visa may have been allotted on July 1st.
Again, I have interpreted a congressional briefing by Charles Oppenheim, Chief, Immigrant Control and Reporting Division, Visa services office of the DOS here:
http://www.immigrationportal.com/sho...72&postcount=3
__________________
EB2 India PERM PD 08/25/2005
I140/I485 TSC RD 09/29/2005
I140 AD 11/09/2005
FP1: 01/04/2006
FP2: 05/04/2007 (No update)
Update message received for address change on 10/04/2006
I485 AD 07/10/2007 (Only other update on 07/10/2007 19:26: Card Production Ordered)
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
2011 hubs and a ikini top.
pd_recapturing
10-19 01:56 PM
I did some more research on this topic. Here are some links:
http://boards.immigration.com/showthread.php?t=205051&highlight=interfile
http://www.immigrateusa.us/index.php?option=com_content&task=view&id=75&Itemid=58 (Search for "Interfiling of I-140 and I-485")
http://boards.immigration.com/showthread.php?t=205051&highlight=interfile
http://www.immigrateusa.us/index.php?option=com_content&task=view&id=75&Itemid=58 (Search for "Interfiling of I-140 and I-485")
more...
gdilla
04-20 05:46 PM
Well, we can keep the org name as IV, and just start a campaign with a better name (with descriptive URLs) without worrying about the overhead of changing registrations, etc.
There are some good points here, "ImmigrationVoice" sounds very broad and comprehensive. Most American's have never even heard of employment based immigration. Furthermore, they don't see what the problem is with H1Bs - they figure, why are you complaining, you are here in the glorious USA, you should be thankfull and happy.
Anyway, some better branding on our part with campaigns can serve the same purpose as a fullblown name change. For example, the campaign could be called: "Competitive Immigration", and it's derivatives. "Innovation America", like CompeteAmerica which has a great name. Also, "Keep America on Top" or KAT, just spewing ideas that come to mind.... and emphasize the need to keep and attract bright minds to America - or else they will compete with us offshore.
So, let's think about hatching campaigns - like a Google AdWord Campaign, for example, and we'll name those campaigns much more purposely and descriptively. And we still get to keep the IV name as the sponsor. Just a thought.
There are some good points here, "ImmigrationVoice" sounds very broad and comprehensive. Most American's have never even heard of employment based immigration. Furthermore, they don't see what the problem is with H1Bs - they figure, why are you complaining, you are here in the glorious USA, you should be thankfull and happy.
Anyway, some better branding on our part with campaigns can serve the same purpose as a fullblown name change. For example, the campaign could be called: "Competitive Immigration", and it's derivatives. "Innovation America", like CompeteAmerica which has a great name. Also, "Keep America on Top" or KAT, just spewing ideas that come to mind.... and emphasize the need to keep and attract bright minds to America - or else they will compete with us offshore.
So, let's think about hatching campaigns - like a Google AdWord Campaign, for example, and we'll name those campaigns much more purposely and descriptively. And we still get to keep the IV name as the sponsor. Just a thought.
kumar1
07-11 03:13 PM
Boss-------Salaam Hai Tumhey ----Maar lo IRS ki!!!
more...
speddi
06-14 10:36 AM
try the financial forum on FatWallet.com
2010 They have 6 top screws that
sen_raju
05-25 07:02 PM
Surely I will.
I have attended rallies before, have contributed, sent flowers to USCIS, got my story published in the newspaper and will continue to do so.
I sincerely hope that all of you also get the good news soon. All the best.
Good for you. Please do continue to provide your support to this community.
I have attended rallies before, have contributed, sent flowers to USCIS, got my story published in the newspaper and will continue to do so.
I sincerely hope that all of you also get the good news soon. All the best.
Good for you. Please do continue to provide your support to this community.
more...
texcan
08-13 11:09 PM
possible reason for mysterious rejections :
You are a mail room guy, you go home friday (06/29) and comeback on monday (06/02).
You start the monkey business of timestamping incoming mail, but half an hours into the day (around 8 or 9:00 am), you realize "sshhttt: i did not change the date on my stamp, its still read 06-29-2007". In the classical govt. fashion, you do not bother to go back and restamp the applications with the correct datetime. Not because you are evil, but because you simply don't understand the ramifications of early stamping. You think u are doing the guy a favor, putting him/her early in line.. but guess what... the guy's application is gonna get rejected.
Could this be the case with some apps mysteriously being rejected?
Friend,
Relax a little. Donot worry its not gonna fix any problem.
My theory of life is ..."every one needs a problem to stay busy, if they
donot have any problems, they will find one".
Think about it, and find a constructive problem.
if you donot like my words, leave it ...please donot be offended.
You are a mail room guy, you go home friday (06/29) and comeback on monday (06/02).
You start the monkey business of timestamping incoming mail, but half an hours into the day (around 8 or 9:00 am), you realize "sshhttt: i did not change the date on my stamp, its still read 06-29-2007". In the classical govt. fashion, you do not bother to go back and restamp the applications with the correct datetime. Not because you are evil, but because you simply don't understand the ramifications of early stamping. You think u are doing the guy a favor, putting him/her early in line.. but guess what... the guy's application is gonna get rejected.
Could this be the case with some apps mysteriously being rejected?
Friend,
Relax a little. Donot worry its not gonna fix any problem.
My theory of life is ..."every one needs a problem to stay busy, if they
donot have any problems, they will find one".
Think about it, and find a constructive problem.
if you donot like my words, leave it ...please donot be offended.
hair With a Jeep, you can find it
rajeshalex
09-16 04:51 AM
Which consulate was this? What questions did they ask?
Did u show your paystubs?
Did u show your paystubs?
more...
rsdang
12-03 01:38 AM
Hi Experts,
The question i've is:
I heard from my Immigration Lawyer that,from November 01, 2008, any person who works in Information Technology (IT) and who has Advanced Degree from USA like Master's is eligible for EB3 Category only and not EB2 category. Please confirm if the above statement is true or not.
Thanks,
Abhi
EB2 or 3 depends on the Job requirements primarily... you could have a masters and be working for a job that requires a bachelors as minimum requirement then you are only going to get an EB3 (no exp example)
The question i've is:
I heard from my Immigration Lawyer that,from November 01, 2008, any person who works in Information Technology (IT) and who has Advanced Degree from USA like Master's is eligible for EB3 Category only and not EB2 category. Please confirm if the above statement is true or not.
Thanks,
Abhi
EB2 or 3 depends on the Job requirements primarily... you could have a masters and be working for a job that requires a bachelors as minimum requirement then you are only going to get an EB3 (no exp example)
hot Bestop full soft top,
BPforGC
07-16 04:35 PM
NSC is like a lottery station. You have no idea when your petition will get adjudicated. Forget the dates. There are only two categories; lucky and unlucky. Lucky guys get out in one year. Unlucky guys stuck for three or four years.
As of now, they are concentrating all the resources towards approving as many Naturalization petitions as possible. Say, 70-80% of their resources are concentrated on that process. They are under tremendous pressure from politicians to get as many new voters for upcoming November elections as possible.
Hiring new staff and training them is going on but you will not see the results until January or February 2009. Apparently, these agents will have to go through thorough FBI check before selected for training. As usual, it met with few bureaucratic delays. They are at least 7 months behind their target in hiring new staff.
Remember, this same agency released "Strategic Vision" report in 2004, where they proclaimed to adjudicate I-140s in 180 days and eliminate backlogs before the end of Bush's presidency. Wow! what an efficient implementation of the "Strategy". Soon, they will come up with a "New Vision", which will get blurred within days. Story repeated.
So, EB guys, forget about our I-140s and 485s for a while. They will crawl, atleast until October end.
More over, what you are dealing with is the most inefficient and callous agency in the US government. Since this agency does not deal directly with US citizens, very rarely they will have to answer anybody, unless they screw up big time.
There are only two things that get you green card; patience and luck.
Good luck to all of us.
As of now, they are concentrating all the resources towards approving as many Naturalization petitions as possible. Say, 70-80% of their resources are concentrated on that process. They are under tremendous pressure from politicians to get as many new voters for upcoming November elections as possible.
Hiring new staff and training them is going on but you will not see the results until January or February 2009. Apparently, these agents will have to go through thorough FBI check before selected for training. As usual, it met with few bureaucratic delays. They are at least 7 months behind their target in hiring new staff.
Remember, this same agency released "Strategic Vision" report in 2004, where they proclaimed to adjudicate I-140s in 180 days and eliminate backlogs before the end of Bush's presidency. Wow! what an efficient implementation of the "Strategy". Soon, they will come up with a "New Vision", which will get blurred within days. Story repeated.
So, EB guys, forget about our I-140s and 485s for a while. They will crawl, atleast until October end.
More over, what you are dealing with is the most inefficient and callous agency in the US government. Since this agency does not deal directly with US citizens, very rarely they will have to answer anybody, unless they screw up big time.
There are only two things that get you green card; patience and luck.
Good luck to all of us.
more...
house Jeep soft top hardware
thescadaman
12-10 12:31 PM
The main issue is not the expiry date of the DL, the issue is why make us verify all the documents and add the 6 month validity constraint even for "Change of Address" requests, and why give us a completely different Vertical Style DL unlike the standard Horizontal style DL.
Also, I have not reached that stage, but what happens with people with EAD? You have to renew every year and can renew only 120 days before Expiry. The expiry date of DL and expiry date of EAD will keep chasing each other and at some point you will LOCKED OUT of DL because of the 6 months validity constraint...
People from other states = Do you have to go through the whole verification process even for "change of address" requests?
Also, I have not reached that stage, but what happens with people with EAD? You have to renew every year and can renew only 120 days before Expiry. The expiry date of DL and expiry date of EAD will keep chasing each other and at some point you will LOCKED OUT of DL because of the 6 months validity constraint...
People from other states = Do you have to go through the whole verification process even for "change of address" requests?
tattoo Bestop Bikini Top
kommisetty
08-21 03:21 PM
Even though i didn't get my GC yet this info is helpful.;)
PD : 2005 Oct. I-485 Still pending :confused:
Hi guys,
...
followup post:
I think there is a mix up here between two things:
180 day clock does start on the first day after filing 485, but that is for the purpose of AC21. Once you use AC21, then the next employer assumes the role of "your future permanent employer" and you should have "intent to permanently work for that(new, not the sponsoring) employer" AT the time of GC approval.
If you use change the employers 7 times using AC21 before your GC gets approved; you should have "intent to work permanently for the latest employer".
You are not bonded slaves. The only issue is that the "burden of proof" of proving the intent to work for such and such employer is on the GC beneficiary and not on USCIS. So in future, if USCIS questions (or CBP questions), it is YOU who has to prove that intent.
One scenario where you WILL NOT BE ABLE TO PROVE IT: if you never worked for the sponsoring employer.
One scenario where you WILL NOT HAVE A PROBLEM PROVING IT: if you worked with sponsoring (or latest AC21) employer after GC approval for some duration (60 days?? 90 days?? 6 months?? 1 year??)...no law on this.
This is the whole purpose of Labor Certification process and I140. And it applies to the categories of EB2 (except NIW) and EB3--any category that requires LC.
This is from my discussion in following thread:
http://immigrationvoice.org/forum/sh...ad.php?t=20403
I just put it here so that everyone would not have to try the link and may be this information is useful to someone.
Good Luck.
PD : 2005 Oct. I-485 Still pending :confused:
Hi guys,
...
followup post:
I think there is a mix up here between two things:
180 day clock does start on the first day after filing 485, but that is for the purpose of AC21. Once you use AC21, then the next employer assumes the role of "your future permanent employer" and you should have "intent to permanently work for that(new, not the sponsoring) employer" AT the time of GC approval.
If you use change the employers 7 times using AC21 before your GC gets approved; you should have "intent to work permanently for the latest employer".
You are not bonded slaves. The only issue is that the "burden of proof" of proving the intent to work for such and such employer is on the GC beneficiary and not on USCIS. So in future, if USCIS questions (or CBP questions), it is YOU who has to prove that intent.
One scenario where you WILL NOT BE ABLE TO PROVE IT: if you never worked for the sponsoring employer.
One scenario where you WILL NOT HAVE A PROBLEM PROVING IT: if you worked with sponsoring (or latest AC21) employer after GC approval for some duration (60 days?? 90 days?? 6 months?? 1 year??)...no law on this.
This is the whole purpose of Labor Certification process and I140. And it applies to the categories of EB2 (except NIW) and EB3--any category that requires LC.
This is from my discussion in following thread:
http://immigrationvoice.org/forum/sh...ad.php?t=20403
I just put it here so that everyone would not have to try the link and may be this information is useful to someone.
Good Luck.
more...
pictures Rampage Cab Top 87-91 Jeep
voldemar
12-11 02:28 PM
It makes no difference whether they allow concurrent filing of 140/485 or not That's not always true. Without concurrent filing my son will not be able to file 485 because he will turn 21 at that time. And I'm pretty sure there are other cases when concurrent filing was very helpful.
dresses Supertop soft tops are
bhavana
05-24 01:18 PM
Fax sent
more...
makeup Rampage Cab Top, 87-91 Jeep
LostInGCProcess
06-18 11:52 AM
How can you say that its not legal? When you sign that contract or piece of paper, it means you are acknowledging to all that is in there. Whether you like it or not, when you sign a paper you essentially are saying, "hay! i read this and I agree, here is my signature"...correct me if I am wrong...
From legal point of view, its 2 parties agreeing to a contract (by signing) however unjustified it may look. Maybe some part of the wording may be legal some may not be...
99% agreements written by the desi consultants are not legal ( they are one sided) . if you dont sign it , you dont get the job.
I am not a lawyer , and this is my personal view out of the experience on being a H1
From legal point of view, its 2 parties agreeing to a contract (by signing) however unjustified it may look. Maybe some part of the wording may be legal some may not be...
99% agreements written by the desi consultants are not legal ( they are one sided) . if you dont sign it , you dont get the job.
I am not a lawyer , and this is my personal view out of the experience on being a H1
girlfriend Tops 9702fjkb Jeep Bikini
AlphaGC
03-06 11:27 PM
Let us get opinion of others on this. Should we write to law-makers to address this issue. Atleast these kids should not suffer. If they have got their most of the education here in US, they should be be given permnent residence before they go to college.
hairstyles mesh with dots ikini top and
WAIT_FOR_EVER_GC
07-12 02:57 PM
Will it come today?
Tommorow or Thursday
Tommorow or Thursday
Hinglish
08-07 09:01 PM
Didn't understand you specifically mentioning "US Stem Graduate" in your signature. What do you want to convey through this statement. Ofcourse other statements looks OK.
I think what is being conveyed is NOT that he is superior .... but that he has been in the US atleast 2 yrs more than when he actually started the journey towards GC by formally putting in an application
I think what is being conveyed is NOT that he is superior .... but that he has been in the US atleast 2 yrs more than when he actually started the journey towards GC by formally putting in an application
sanju_dba
06-25 03:18 PM
2) Currently your status is H1 , if you use AP then ur status will becom Parolee and if you use EAD then "???"
Incorrect.
Just using AP does NOT invalidates H1 status. Using EAD does.
I double checked with my attorney , either or AP or EAD usage will change your status, ie H1 is no more valid.
Incorrect.
Just using AP does NOT invalidates H1 status. Using EAD does.
I double checked with my attorney , either or AP or EAD usage will change your status, ie H1 is no more valid.
